Effect of climate change.
Sushree Shailani Suman
1- Perishing green plants: Is global warming the cause?
Global warming is a growing concern
worldwide with climate change being the most talked subject. Its effects are
well known on plants and the photosynthetic process. The increased
concentration of heat-trapping greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide (CO2)
and methane (CH4) has accelerated global warming in manifold and led
to extreme events such as cyclonic storms, typhoons, drought, unseasonal
rainfall, and heat waves.
2- How
do plants deal with global warming?
The most surprising fact about CO2
is its ability to increase the rate of photosynthesis in green plants, particularly
the C3 plants. Through photosynthesis, green plants absorb CO2 from
the atmosphere and subsequently convert it into organic products (like
carbohydrates, lipids, proteins, etc.) and byproducts (like oxygen). This
process has been considered as a source of carbon dioxide sequestration.
Elevated atmospheric CO2
levels lead to temperature rise with a concomitant increase in the rate of
transpiration by the green plants. However, if the plant responds by stomatal
closure, the rate of transpiration may decrease. This does not allow excess CO2
to enter the plant and results in an increased survival rate during water
scarcity. The advantages are time bound. This also has several adverse effects
on the photosynthetic process as absorption of less CO2 means
stunted growth. Closed stomata for a longer duration may lead to starvation in
plants. Due to less partial pressure of CO2, the stomata will be
left open, resulting in rapid water loss along with CO2 intake.
Subsequently, the plants wither, wilt and die, which may have huge social
implications.
Apart from the above-mentioned facts, the enhanced level of CO2 is also marked by increased plant growth that might sound good to the farmers. Conversely, the weeds surrounding the vegetation tend to grow at a faster rate in such environmental conditions.
But such responses by the photosynthetic plants are
dependent on diverse environmental factors such as availability of water,
moisture content of the soil, nutrient content, atmospheric temperature, and variable
CO2 concentration, etc. Responses may be negative or positive depending
on the exact nature of changes and the factors that initially limited the
growth and rate of photosynthesis.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Green revolution and its loopholes
Sushree Shailani Suman
1- Green Revolution for Mass: The advanced Mexican agricultural technology
introduced by Norman Borlaug made a way out for the evolutionary technology in
India, which was initiated as a trial project by Dr. M.S. Swaminathan in the
northern states of India, especially Punjab and Haryana. The technology
received various approbations from the scientific circles: “Green revolution describes the spectacular increase that took place
during 1967–1978, and is continuing in the production of food grains in India”-
was cited by J.G. Harrar.
2- Advancements: Green
revolution proved to be a track changer in the traditional farming techniques (introduction
of tractors, thrashers, harvesters; use of chemical fertilizers, pesticides,
herbicides, for instant increase in the yield, etc.) as well as replacing the
traditional seeds with high yielding varieties or seeds with genetic
superiority.
3- Prolonged Loopholes: Apart from the advantages, green revolution proved
to be a bane in disguise for the farmers. It has over burdened them with the
increasing costs of chemical fertilizers, pesticides as well as other
chemicals. The technology aimed at increasing the production of only the staple
cereal crops, like rice and wheat, that too only in the north Indian states. The
technology was not well implemented or did not give a proceeding result in many
parts of the country.
The
genetically superior seeds demanded more water, fertilizers and other accessory
chemicals, for their growth and development. The overuse of these chemical
ingredients has led to the detoriation and deformation in the chemistry and
structure of the soil. The natural soil microbiotas are kept aloof of the soil
organic carbon content, which is their nutrition source. The unavailability of
the soil carbon leads to a decrease in the concentration of the beneficial soil
microbiota that plays an important role in maintaining the structure of the
soil. Due to this, the soil particles are left apart and they become compact
and lose the water holding capacity.
The
depletion in the soil organic carbon leads to the decrease in the soil’s
buffering capacity that in turn affects the pH level of the soil. Lowering in
the pH level affects various parameters like the unavailability of phosphorus,
magnesium, calcium, which in turn affects the physiology of the plants; stunted
growth of the plants, decreased root biomass and length, etc. whereas high pH level
leads to a decrease in the availability of micronutrients like copper, zinc,
boron, etc., which also affects the overall growth and developmental process of
the plant. Decrease in the buffering capacity also leads to an increase in the
thatch layer, which in turn aggravates the pathogenic population in the soil. In
order to kill these pathogens, it is needed to use chemicals that, on the
contrary, kill the beneficial organisms in the soil too.
Apart
from these drawbacks, the technology of green revolution has neither proved to
be a long-term solution, nor has it ensured food security for the rising
population of our country.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------